Iron Man 2

You don’t go into a movie like Iron Man 2 expecting greatness. It’s graded on a curve.

Does it make you laugh? Excite you? Show you things you haven’t seen before? Does it make for a diverting two hours away from the summer sun?

Iron Man 2 does most of those things but it doesn’t do much else. It’s a hodge-podge of ideas and characters that never coalesce into anything meaningful.

This isn’t always the case with sequels, particularly comic book sequels. Superman II raised the stakes of the first film, introduced three formidable villains and stripped Superman of his powers as it developed his relationship with Lois Lane. Spider-Man 2 was a major improvement on the first film, with Alfred Molina’s Doctor Octopus as the perfect foil for a maturing Peter Parker. And The Dark Knight built on the solid reboot of Batman Begins and, thanks in large part to Heath Ledger’s iconic performance as The Joker, emerged as a visionary masterpiece of a gothic crime movie.

Iron Man 2 doesn’t try to do any of that. It plays more as a set-up for future sequels and spin-offs (The Avengers and Thor among them) and as an excuse for some scenery-chewing by an assembly of fine actors.

I was initially wary of this movie because I suspected the filmmakers had stocked up on villains and sidekicks under a misguided “more is better” philosophy. But that suspicion was unfounded.

In fact, my chief complaint about Iron Man 2 is that we don’t get enough of the villains. Sam Rockwell, as always, steals the show as Justin Hammer, a weapons manufacturer jealous of Tony Stark’s success. And Mickey Rourke brings nuance to Ivan Vanko, the Russian physicist/psychopath who becomes Iron Man’s biggest threat. I wanted to see more of both of these guys.

Working for the good guys are Pepper Potts, Stark’s assistant and love interest, played well by Gwyneth Paltrow; Natalie Rushman, a new hire with a mysterious background and the curves of Scarlett Johansson; and Lt. Col. James Rhodes, military man and Stark’s best friend, played in this film by Don Cheadle, who inherited the role from Terrence Howard.

All three acquit themselves well, especially Paltrow, who plays well off of Robert Downey Jr. — these two have the sort of real chemistry you usually don’t find in comic book movies.

As for Robert Downey Jr… he was born to play Tony Stark, the egotistical man-child who saves the world mostly because it looks good on him. He is the rare superhero who provides the comic relief in his own movie and as always he commands the screen (though his facial hair is distractingly over-designed).

So yes, the parts are all in place, but the story doesn’t live up to their potential. Stark is fighting two enemies here: his own mortality, in the form of a depleting supply of power to his chest battery; and the scramble by the rest of the world to develop technology to match his Iron Man suit, most successfully by Rourke’s Vanko. Neither of these storylines provides much dramatic heft, and both are resolved quickly and lamely.

We’re left to enjoy the film for its smaller moments… a fight between Potts and Stark interrupted by a rotating desk ornament, Downey’s exchanges with his computer J.A.R.V.I.S. (again voiced by Paul Bettany), Sam Rockwell delivering an inspired monologue about a suite of high-tech weaponry.

There is a lot of talent behind this movie, and they appear to have had a lot of fun making it… it’s a pity it ultimately amounted to so little.

4 thoughts on “Iron Man 2

  1. pegclifton says:

    Well, since we’re not planning to see this one, I feel a bit better reading your review. While I’m a fan of Robert Downey Jr., I find that he mumbles and we’re asking each other what he just said, missing the next line of the movie. That bothers me because his comments tend to be so witty. In Sherlock Holmes, I fought to listen hard, but I know I missed some of the quips, and Dad probably more then me. Maybe we’re getting old and our hearing is going, but I don’t have problems with other actors–Just saying.

  2. Amy says:

    Robert Downey does NOT mumble! Just saying 😉

    I enjoyed the movie a great deal. While it ultimately amounted to little, I’m not sure what these types of movies are supposed to amount to….

    If you wanted to dig for deep meanings, you could certainly make a case for the father/son dynamic that is explored between Ivan and his father, Tony and his own. The fact that Tony must confront his own mortality and utlimately finds the key to saving himself by unlocking an intricate puzzle left to him by his father makes that story all the more compelling.

    I didn’t go to the movie to find those sorts of issues explored; I went (though I didn’t realize it at the time) to see Scarlett Johansonn do some fabulous acrobatic moves while dispensing a bunch of garden variety “bad guys,” to listen to Tony Stark crack wise when flirting with Pepper Potts (best named cartoon movie heroine EVER!), to enjoy Sam Rockwell chewing scenery as the brains behind Rourke’s brawn. Still, the psychological drama was there, and I’ve thought about that storyline since leaving my empty bucket of popcorn behind.

    My point? This movie delivered everything I wanted from the sequel to Iron Man and offered me a few meaningful relationships to ponder that I neither expected nor needed to enjoy the film. In my book, that makes Iron Man 2 a worthy sequel in every way.

  3. Clay says:

    I don’t disagree with anything you’re saying, although I found the solution of his chest battery problem via his father’s elaborate Epcot panorama a bit befuddling. I did like seeing Mad Men MVP John Slattery as Stark’s father.

    How do you compare this movie to the original? Or to Spider-Man 2?

  4. Amy says:

    Spider-Man 2
    Iron Man
    Iron Man 2

    (at least at 6:21 a.m. this morning; could shift by noon 🙂

Leave a reply to Amy Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.